Postscriptum to Folco Boffin

The place to ask and debate all rules issues related to MECCG.
Post Reply
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

I forgot to add in the thread:
https://councilofelrond.org/forum/viewt ... 616#p42616
that if Folco Boffin is discarded to play other Hobbit with his company at resolution there is no Folco Boffin's company and if Folco Boffin was only character in his company when he was discarded there is no even his former company.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

dirhaval wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2024 3:25 pm Lastly, it appears that the Hobbit Folco delivers is under no influence; that is if Folco was a follower, then the new Hobbit is not anyone's follower and will free direct influence to Folco's controller such as to influence an opponent at a Haven.
Good point.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

And yet postscriptum to Strider,
Situation (in my opinion) comparable to playing Aragorn II when Strider is in play.
Radagast the Tamer implicitly allows for playing Radagast, not generally because playing of Radagast generally does not require a special allowance, but in special case - when Radagast the Tamer, manifestation of Radagast, is in play. It says "Discard this card if Radgast comes into play."
To use the allowance in first place a player needs a situation when he may play Wizard.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)”